Love at first sight or family very first?

Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Ties one of partner identity attribute similarity, relationships beginning, matchmaking top quality, and love. [ Links ]

Baxter, L. An excellent., AsianDate-app & Western, L. (2003). Partners thinking of the parallels and you will variations: An effective dialectical direction. Record of Personal and you can Social Relationship, 20, 491-514. [ Website links ]

Berscheid, Elizabeth. (1985)patibility, interdependence, and feeling. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you can in conflict dating (pp. 143-161). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]

Berscheid, E., Dion, K., Walster, Age., & Walster, Grams. W. (1971). Real attractiveness and dating selection: An examination of your complimentary hypothesis. Log regarding Fresh Societal Mindset, seven, 173-189. [ Backlinks ]

Log of Public and private Dating, 24, 479-496

Berscheid, Elizabeth., & Regan, P. (2005). Brand new therapy from interpersonal relationships. Top Seat River, NJ: Pearson Education (Prentice Hallway). [ Website links ]

Berger, C. R. (1975). Task show and you may attributional communications because the determinants from interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 40, 280-286. [ Website links ]

Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Destination and you may romantic relationship. Into the D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), New guide away from societal psychology (Vol. 2, next ed. Pp. 193-281). Nyc: McGraw-Slope. [ Hyperlinks ]

Buckwalter, J. G., Carter, S. Roentgen., Forgatch, Grams. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, Letter. C. (2004, Can get 11). You.S. Patent 6,735,568. Arizona, DC. [ Hyperlinks ]

Buckwalter, J. G., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, G. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, N. C. (2008, Nov. 18). You.S. Patent seven,454,357B2. Washington, DC. [ Hyperlinks ]

Buss, D. Yards. (1984). Relationship diversity having character dispositions: Assessment having three some other studies present. Conclusion Genes, fourteen, 111-123. [ Website links ]

Byrne, D., & Rhamey, Roentgen. (1965). Magnitude out of negative and positive reinforcements because the a beneficial determinant out-of attraction. Diary off Identification and Societal Mindset, dos, 884-889. [ Links ]

Carter, S. R. (2005, Feb.), Getting modern-go out Cupids, study changes matchmaking: Emotional technology is actually behind the new successful fits made on eHarmony. Association to possess Psychological Science Observer, 18. Downloaded regarding [ Website links ]

Carter, S. R., & Buckwalter, J. G. (2009). Improving spouse alternatives through the internet: An assessment out-of relationship high quality between marriage ceremonies due to an online matchmaking system and you can marriages due to unfettered options. Interpersona: A major international Record towards the Personal Matchmaking, step three, 105-125. [ Hyperlinks ]

Carter, S., & Accumulated snow, C. (2004, May). Helping american singles enter most useful marriages playing with predictive types of marital triumph. Report exhibited within 16th Yearly Meeting of your own Western Mental People. [ Hyperlinks ]

Means and you can system to possess identifying individuals who are browsing has a successful relationship

C). How come personality number within the ination out of attribute nervousness, negativity, and you may marital satisfaction. Log regarding Personality and you may Public Mindset, 78, 326-336. [ Backlinks ]

Clark, Yards. S. (1985). Ramifications off dating style of for skills being compatible. During the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and incompatible dating (pp. 119-140). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]

Coombs, Roentgen. H., & Kenkel, W. F. (1966). Sex variations in matchmaking ambition and you will fulfillment having computer system-create couples. Journal from ily, 28, 62-66. [ Backlinks ]

Cooper, A great., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Love on the internet: Facts on the internet interest. Diary of Sex Knowledge and Therapy, twenty-two, 7-14. [ Backlinks ]

Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). Manage someone know what they need: The same otherwise subservient lover? Evolutionary Therapy, 6, 595-602. [ Hyperlinks ]

Feingold, A great. (1988). Matching getting attractiveness into the close couples and you can same-sex loved ones: A good meta-study and you may theoretical critique. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 226-235. [ Backlinks ]

Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Of popular with terrible: Disenchantment with a romantic spouse. Sociological Perspectives, forty two, 263-280. [ Links ]

vad Г¤r en postorderbrud

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *